Theater & Film

Theater review: Audiences sour on “A Life in the Theatre” at Atlanta’s Alliance

by Wendell Brock | Nov 9, 2009

Glitzy musicals of varying quality have dominated the Atlanta theater season thus far. “Come Fly With Me,” Twyla Tharp’s Broadway-caliber homage to the music of Frank Sinatra, received its world premiere at the Alliance Theatre earlier this fall, and Lin-Manuel Miranda’s affectionate portrait of the Latino community — the Tony Award-winning “In the Heights” — just completed a six-day run at the Fox Theatre.

These high-profile productions have made us hungry for some straight-on drama, and we were hoping to be able to tout David Mamet’s “A Life in the Theatre” — starring Broadway legend Andre De Shields and New York actor Ariel Shafir — as a hidden gem. But it’s hard to recommend this lulu.

LITT4376 The Alliance’s Nov. 4 opening-night crowd was stuffed with local thespians, who responded to the characters’ preening insecurities with knowing titters. But when all was said and done, only a few patrons stood to give the performance a standing ovation. For Atlanta’s famously generous audiences, such a response falls somewhere between the inhospitable and the hostile.

If you don’t know Mamet’s psychologically thin, 26-scene two-hander, think of it as a corrosive, masculine take on “All About Eve.” It describes the twisted relationship between a veteran actor (De Shields, at left in photo) and his easily influenced young scene partner (Shafir), who work together night after night in a repertory theater company.

Director Robert O’Hara’s over-embellished style — which plays up the homoerotic tension between the characters and transforms some of the material into camp spectacle — is kind of reminiscent of the work of Kent Gash, the Alliance’s former associate artistic director. When Gash got handed a weak script, his impulse was to jazz up the show with lavish window dressing, outsized performances and unconventional casting. (See “Sleuth” from 2007.)

“Make them applaud the shoe,” Gash once told me, clapping his hands to the imaginary presence of a grand diva, making her entrance with fancy footwear.

LITT0704 Instead of shoes, O’Hara literally dresses his diva in red vampire drag and puts an E.T.-like creature on an operating table. This is like trying to patch up a hemorrhaging script with gaudy masking tape. De Shields’ performance is weirdly fascinating, and the handsome Shafir — who showed off his comic inventiveness in the 2006 Alliance production of Steve Martin’s “The Underpants” — is poorly served here. It’s really not the actors’ fault that the piece is so turgid.

I hash out my problems with the show in my AJC review. It may sound a bit harsh — I called it “a risky, puzzling, borderline irresponsible choice” — but is meant to raise a red flag of concern. The Alliance has had a strong run of successes in recent years, but shows like this aren’t going to do it any favors. Audiences won’t keep spending their hard-earned dollars on such wretched fare. They’ll lose trust. They’ll stay home.


Share:
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • FriendFeed
  • Faves
  • del.icio.us
Email This Post Email This Post

One Comment, Comment or Ping

  1. 1

    For me, the show in no way portrayed actors the way most of them actually are. This director made the older actor pathetic and the younger actor an opportunist. Both actors were incapable of making their entrances much less analyzing a script. The vast majority of actors I know work way too hard for far less than they deserve in order to give the world (or our little part of it) the best possible evening of entertainment.
    I blame the director for most of the problems in the show. I know both actors were sent down the “wrong path.” The best example of that thorny path was at the end of the show when the older actor emerges from the shower in his underwear. I can only suppose that at some point in the rehearsal process the director thought it would be great if there was some nudity. This shower scene was nowhere in the script. The way an audience member can deduce that is the fact that Mamet uses the word “basin” — as in “sink.” Leaving certain elements “up to interpretation” is valid, but a director should make sure his ideas are rooted in the text.
    I am lucky to spend time with smart actors that make me think about life in a different way.They are capable of making choices in their characters that are interesting and, at times, even profound. They are able to sing beautifully, soliloquize brilliantly and fill a stage with their personalities.
    I am grateful every time an actor enters our theatre. They are the gift we give our audience. Our patrons have come to expect great stories told by gifted storytellers. If we portray actors as less than brilliant, then those same patrons have one more excuse to devalue what we do. In this economy, people don’t need any more excuses to NOT support the work we are ALL trying to do.

    09 Nov

Reply to “Theater review: Audiences sour on “A Life in the Theatre” at Atlanta’s Alliance”