Verdi’s “Aida,” oversized yet dramatically subtle, is always a good show — even when the title soprano cancels two hours before curtain, even when the rest of the cast sounds under the weather (with one notable exception), and even when the conductor paces the evening erratically.
The Atlanta Opera’s “Aida,” which opened Saturday at the Cobb Energy Performing Arts Centre and runs through March 7, is all that and more. And there’s an unusual amount of backstory to this production.
Set in ancient Egypt, this epic of a doomed love triangle, with the fate of nations hanging in the balance, is the grandest of operas. For better or usually worse, few companies today can resist a Cecil B. DeMille-style extravaganza. With opening-night cancellations, however, no one knew what might happen; everyone on stage and in the sold-out audience was on high alert.
Soprano Mary Elizabeth Williams had been scheduled to sing the first Aida of her career. At her Atlanta Opera debut, in 2005 as Serena in “Porgy and Bess,” Williams had the most powerfully gorgeous voice in the cast. At 33, she’s carefully building a substantial reputation, singing Puccini and Verdi heroines around the country to very positive reviews.
When I interviewed Williams on Thursday afternoon, a few hours before the dress rehearsal, she told me, “Yesterday, I woke up with a cold. When I was 27 that would have spun me into orbit. But now I know I’m prepared for the vocal demands and dramatic heft of Aida. I know I can sing it, so I can deal with a cold.”

Antonello Palombi and Mary Elizabeth Williams at the Thursday night "Aida" dress rehearsal, where the soprano sang just fine. By Saturday she'd lost part of her voice. Production photos by Tim Wilkerson
But that cold was soon diagnosed as a sinus infection. With no understudy on hand, the opera flew in soprano Indra Thomas from New York. An Atlanta native, she performed “Aida” with the Atlanta Opera for its inaugural show at the Civic Center in 2003 and has since sung the role widely. Thomas walked through the staging and had a quick rehearsal with conductor Yoel Levi — just in case.
Then, at 6 p.m. Saturday, the opera’s general director Dennis Hanthorn made the call: Williams was out, Thomas in.
In performance, Thomas is a deeply sympathetic heroine. She radiates charisma, nobility and vulnerability all at once, and her voice is large and, at times, beautifully piercing. Yet Saturday her instrument sounded in tatters. Top notes were more or less solid, but she’s lost a naturally flowing middle range. To compensate, she seemed to push her chesty low voice upward, which led to many scooping and barking sounds. In the opera’s most intoxicating aria, “O patria mia,” accompanied by sweet-toned oboist Dane Philipsen — where our heroine longs for her homeland — Thomas backed off notes before they cracked, which distorted her every phrase.

Indra Thomas (singing Aida at the Palm Beach Opera). Photo by Steven Caras
Still, Thomas was affecting for her quieter, lyrical monologues, such as “Ritorna vincitor” in Act 1. By opera’s end — sealed in a tomb for eternity with her lover, Radamès — her star power and basic talents were utterly convincing. Is this a gifted soprano who has sung too many heavy roles too soon? Can she retool the voice and sing to her amazing potential?
And who will sing the title role in the remaining three performances? Thomas was free Saturday but has other dates beginning Monday. Mary Elizabeth Williams’ Aida debut is thus scheduled for the next performance, Tuesday. (You can bet Hanthorn is on the phone right now, scrambling to find a third Aida — just in case.)
Italian tenor Antonello Palombi, as the Egyptian warrior Radamès, is the most famous operatic stand-in from recent memory. You can catch the story on YouTube: At Milan’s fabled La Scala, where opera is a blood sport, celebrity tenor Roberto Alagna was booed after his opening aria, “Celeste Aida.” Alagna raised an angry fist as he stormed off stage. The music never stopped, and his understudy, Palombi, in street clothes, picked up where the star left off.
Palombi received wild cheers at the end, and he joined Leonard Bernstein and Andre Watts, among many, as replacements who scored big when the pressure was on. Despite this worldwide burst of attention, however, Palombi’s career hasn’t much taken off. He remains a middle-tier tenor.

Antonello Palombi going casual at La Scala. Image from Italian TV
In Atlanta, the reasons were apparent. His voice is large and lovely, especially for Radamès’ many heroic, open-hydrant declarations of love. But his diction is sloppy — I couldn’t catch a single word of his Italian — and he seemed unable to sing any consonants. The result was a stream of undifferentiated tones, and you never had the sense that he was in control of his instrument.
With the romantic leads stumbling, mezzo Elizabeth Bishop, as Amneris, easily became the opera’s dominant voice. The clarity of her diction, the focus of her tone and her elegant sense of line made her Verdi interpretation a little closer to Rossini’s lean bel canto than Puccini’s succulent verissimo. I like my Verdi that way. Bishop’s anguish during Radamès’ judgment scene, in the final act, was a highlight of the evening, vocally and dramatically.
Baritone Mark Delavan sang an authoritative Flying Dutchman in Atlanta last season. He returned as Amonasro, Aida’s father and the King of Ethiopia, though he, too, seemed troubled in the throat Saturday night, as if he had a cold.
Bass Morris Robinson, as Ramfis, gulped his syllables — and yet, in sound and presence, made an extremely imposing high priest. Robinson lives in Atlanta; for his curtain call he jumped out with a charming little hip-hop move, pointing at his hometown crowd, blowing kisses, returning the audience’s affection.
Atlanta rented this production, with stock stone-pillar sets, from the New Orleans Opera. A.T. Jones’ costumes evoked ancient-empire epics, from “The Ten Commandments” to “Caligula,” and would probably look better on a slimmer bunch of people. Rotund opera singers in faux Egyptian frocks exaggerate the kitsch factor.
I’ve been harsh on Yoel Levi for his Atlanta Opera conducting — leading the orchestra in emotionally coarse and anti-lyrical accompaniments for “Hansel and Gretel” (in 2007) and “The Elixir of Love” (earlier this season). I think of Levi for dazzling symphonic precision, not for the supple quality of breathing with singers — a fundamental that any capable opera conductor would do by instinct.
Well, his “Aida” is a fresh change. Levi responded with sympathy to the singers and brought intensity to the drama. The orchestra played well for him. True, he paced the Triumphal Scene — all those blazing trumpets and stentorian cries from the chorus — like a metronome, or a provincial bandmaster. But overall, Levi and company delivered a grand “Aida.”
Email This Post
9 Comments, Comment or Ping
countertenor
How professional is it to call the opera chorus Fat and Kitsch. This isn’t project runway Mr. Ruhe. You are tastless.
Lew
No, it’s a review. Reviews are critical (by definition!) I don’t see any reference to *the chorus* as fat and kitschy. A critic’s job is to call it like he sees it.
countertenor
Lew, You obviously did not read the entire review.
“would probably look better on a slimmer bunch of people. Rotund opera singers in faux Egyptian frocks exaggerate the kitsch factor.”
but i digress.
Leif the Countertenor
Dear ArtsCriticAtl Staff,
Most of the time I find performance reviews very helpful for both the prospective audience member and the performer. The review of Aida that Pierre so tactlessly accomplished was beyond the brink of kitsch, as he so stated of the chorus members. I understand that as a music critic, one must voice their artistic opinion.
Pierre stated: costumes evoked ancient-empire epics, from “The Ten Commandments” to “Caligula,” and would probably look better on a slimmer bunch of people. Rotund opera singers in faux Egyptian frocks exaggerate the kitsch factor.
This is not even close to being a remark you would expect from a widely accepted and educated music critic like himself. It is not only rude and tasteless, but discouraging to the efforts that the chorus members put into the production of this performance. As a musician, I expected an educated useful critique, but instead was offered an easily dished insult.
Critiquing is not about insulting. If that was the case you should hire a rebellious high schooler with an elaborate vocabulary to do the job. I hope and expect, if there is any ounce of support for local arts, that remarks of this nature are edited or removed from such reviews. I await your response.
An extremely disappointed reader & musician.
Leif Westermark
hmmm
i may be mistaken, but i believe that the original post specifically referred to the chorus in the “rotund” remark. i feel like i remember this because it was the only reference to the chorus in the whole review. is it possible that the article has been changed since countertenor’s comment? regardless of who it referred to, was it really a necessary comment?
Lew
Mr Ruhe already answered this, but countertenor I put the asterisks around *the chorus* because he did not mention *the chorus.* He mentioned *opera singers.” As Mr. Ruhe pointed out, if he were referring to *the chorus* he would have said so. The opera singers in his review are the principal cast. And I’m sorry if this hurts folks, but singers whose size detracts from their performance (e.g. their believability in a certain role) is cause for a critic to take notice. Many of us have seen aging rotund sopranos attempting to pass themselves off as Butterfly. From a dramatic standpoint it Just Doesn’t Work.
Traveled Taster
For years Mr. Ruhe’s ‘reviews’ about the Atlanta Opera’s performances have been nothing more than snarky comments. The manner in which he made it his mission to run Fred Scott out of town sounded like a jilted lover seeking revenge. Now with his comments about the rotund singers he has tipped it completely over the edge to render his writing completely worthless. No wonder the AJC didn’t keep him on as a staff writer – a monkey with a typewriter could do better. ( There – how does that feel? )
With an ear as rarefied as his seems to be and an eye so easily offended by the foibles of the varieties of the human body in costumes designed to fit all sizes slim and not so slim, one must wonder why Mr. Ruhe continues to subject himself to so much constant disappointment. Why don’t you, Mr. Ruhe, leave Atlanta to those less prone to emotional jabs and move to NYC where there are no rotund singers and every costume is individually designed and all singers are in top voice at every utterance. You’ll feel better, I promise.
Lew
Methinks the bitterness comes not from Mr. Ruhe but from his detractors! The AJC gutted their entire arts staff, which says more about the paper (and it’s readers) and this city than it does about Mr. Ruhe’s reviews. This city has no real support for the arts. It’s money, money that fuels this city. Is it any wonder we have no soul?
Peter Stelling
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Please see the review written by James Paulk and printed in the Tuesday, March 2 AJC for a really accurate account of the Atlanta Opera’s opening night AIDA. The above review is so off the mark I refuse to dignify it with a direct response.
Reply to “Opera review: Backstage drama and some real excitement in the Atlanta Opera’s “Aida””